oral microbiome analysis dna Search Results


99
Thermo Fisher purelink microbiome dna purification kit
Purelink Microbiome Dna Purification Kit, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/oral+microbiome+analysis+dna/DNA/pmc07792486-245-12-17
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
purelink microbiome dna purification kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

97
Qiagen qiamp dna microbiome kit
The oral swab samples were collected from the mice after chronic oral inoculation of the <t>microbiome,</t> while feces were collected from the intestines at the time of mouse sacrifice (fresh catch). The quantification of A. meyeri, A. odontolyticus , and N. elongata specific <t>DNA</t> was evaluated using qPCR with their specific primers. To count colony-forming units and construct a standard curve for each bacterium, genomic DNA was isolated from four serial dilutions of pure culture through the same DNA extraction method (starting from 1 × 10 9 ). This genomic DNA was then used in the qPCR assay, and the Ct values obtained from the qPCR were employed to generate a standard curve and determine the CFU/mL titer of respective bacteria in mouse oral samples. Data are represented as mean±SEM (n=6 in each group), **p < 0.001, One-way ANOVA, followed by Mann-Whitney U-test.
Qiamp Dna Microbiome Kit, supplied by Qiagen, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/oral+microbiome+analysis+dna/QIAamp+DNA+Microbiome+Kit/bio_rxiv__2025__11__21__689724-234-11-15
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
qiamp dna microbiome kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
DNA Genotek omnigene-oral om-501 saliva microbiome dna collection kit
The oral swab samples were collected from the mice after chronic oral inoculation of the <t>microbiome,</t> while feces were collected from the intestines at the time of mouse sacrifice (fresh catch). The quantification of A. meyeri, A. odontolyticus , and N. elongata specific <t>DNA</t> was evaluated using qPCR with their specific primers. To count colony-forming units and construct a standard curve for each bacterium, genomic DNA was isolated from four serial dilutions of pure culture through the same DNA extraction method (starting from 1 × 10 9 ). This genomic DNA was then used in the qPCR assay, and the Ct values obtained from the qPCR were employed to generate a standard curve and determine the CFU/mL titer of respective bacteria in mouse oral samples. Data are represented as mean±SEM (n=6 in each group), **p < 0.001, One-way ANOVA, followed by Mann-Whitney U-test.
Omnigene Oral Om 501 Saliva Microbiome Dna Collection Kit, supplied by DNA Genotek, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/oral+microbiome+analysis+dna/omnigene+oral++om+501++kit/pmc08268706-85-6-13
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
omnigene-oral om-501 saliva microbiome dna collection kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
ATCC microbiome
Differences in oral <t>microbiota</t> between Group 1 and Group 2 (1—Group 1; 0—Group 2).
Microbiome, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/oral+microbiome+analysis+dna/Mycobiome+Genomic%3B+DNA+Mix/pmc07761068-107-22-23
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
microbiome - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Pyrosequencing Inc oral microbiome profiles
Differences in oral <t>microbiota</t> between Group 1 and Group 2 (1—Group 1; 0—Group 2).
Oral Microbiome Profiles, supplied by Pyrosequencing Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/oral+microbiome+analysis+dna/microbiome+oral+profiles/wang_xiaoru__2011__activation_of_fungal_silent_biosythetic_pathways_by_epigenetic_modification-1278-16-21
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
oral microbiome profiles - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
DNA Genotek the oragene om-505 is a microbiome collection kit
Differences in oral <t>microbiota</t> between Group 1 and Group 2 (1—Group 1; 0—Group 2).
The Oragene Om 505 Is A Microbiome Collection Kit, supplied by DNA Genotek, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/oral+microbiome+analysis+dna/omnigene+discover+sample+collection+kit/med_rxiv__2020__05__11__20092338-39-5-9
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
the oragene om-505 is a microbiome collection kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

92
ATCC additional dna mocks
Differences in oral <t>microbiota</t> between Group 1 and Group 2 (1—Group 1; 0—Group 2).
Additional Dna Mocks, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/oral+microbiome+analysis+dna/Oral+Microbiome%3B+Whole+Cell+Mix/pmc08813934-83-4-7
Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
additional dna mocks - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
92/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
ATCC oral microbiome actinomyces odontolyticus
Differences in oral <t>microbiota</t> between Group 1 and Group 2 (1—Group 1; 0—Group 2).
Oral Microbiome Actinomyces Odontolyticus, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/oral+microbiome+analysis+dna/Fusobacterium+nucleatum%3B+Strain+VPI+4355%3B+genomic+DNA/pmc08938898__jamapediatr___e220187___s001-45-6-10
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
oral microbiome actinomyces odontolyticus - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Toyobo kod dna polymerase
Differences in oral <t>microbiota</t> between Group 1 and Group 2 (1—Group 1; 0—Group 2).
Kod Dna Polymerase, supplied by Toyobo, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/oral+microbiome+analysis+dna/KOD+DNA+Polymerase/custom%40kod-101%4023539062
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
kod dna polymerase - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Integrated DNA Technologies gene synthesis
Differences in oral <t>microbiota</t> between Group 1 and Group 2 (1—Group 1; 0—Group 2).
Gene Synthesis, supplied by Integrated DNA Technologies, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/oral+microbiome+analysis+dna/Gene+Synthesis/custom%40gene-synthesis%4039389243
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gene synthesis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Enamine Ltd cetylpyridinium chloride
Differences in oral <t>microbiota</t> between Group 1 and Group 2 (1—Group 1; 0—Group 2).
Cetylpyridinium Chloride, supplied by Enamine Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/oral+microbiome+analysis+dna/Cetylpyridinium+chloride/custom%40en300-302067%4025106845
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cetylpyridinium chloride - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
DNA Genotek at-home kit
Differences in oral <t>microbiota</t> between Group 1 and Group 2 (1—Group 1; 0—Group 2).
At Home Kit, supplied by DNA Genotek, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/oral+microbiome+analysis+dna/at+home+kit/10__1056_slash_evidoa2200282-105-30-33
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
at-home kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


The oral swab samples were collected from the mice after chronic oral inoculation of the microbiome, while feces were collected from the intestines at the time of mouse sacrifice (fresh catch). The quantification of A. meyeri, A. odontolyticus , and N. elongata specific DNA was evaluated using qPCR with their specific primers. To count colony-forming units and construct a standard curve for each bacterium, genomic DNA was isolated from four serial dilutions of pure culture through the same DNA extraction method (starting from 1 × 10 9 ). This genomic DNA was then used in the qPCR assay, and the Ct values obtained from the qPCR were employed to generate a standard curve and determine the CFU/mL titer of respective bacteria in mouse oral samples. Data are represented as mean±SEM (n=6 in each group), **p < 0.001, One-way ANOVA, followed by Mann-Whitney U-test.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Cannabis-enriched oral Actinomyces induces anxiety-like behavior via impairing mitochondria and GABA signaling

doi: 10.1101/2025.11.21.689724

Figure Lengend Snippet: The oral swab samples were collected from the mice after chronic oral inoculation of the microbiome, while feces were collected from the intestines at the time of mouse sacrifice (fresh catch). The quantification of A. meyeri, A. odontolyticus , and N. elongata specific DNA was evaluated using qPCR with their specific primers. To count colony-forming units and construct a standard curve for each bacterium, genomic DNA was isolated from four serial dilutions of pure culture through the same DNA extraction method (starting from 1 × 10 9 ). This genomic DNA was then used in the qPCR assay, and the Ct values obtained from the qPCR were employed to generate a standard curve and determine the CFU/mL titer of respective bacteria in mouse oral samples. Data are represented as mean±SEM (n=6 in each group), **p < 0.001, One-way ANOVA, followed by Mann-Whitney U-test.

Article Snippet: Total microbial DNA was extracted from the oral samples using a QIAmp DNA Microbiome kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. qPCR was performed using a CFX96 Real-time system (Bio-Rad).

Techniques: Construct, Isolation, DNA Extraction, Bacteria, MANN-WHITNEY

(a) Baseline levels before starting the battery of behavioral tests. Home cage locomotor activity was increased in all microbiome treatments as compared to the control (F (3,20) =10.12, p=0.0003). All mice healthily gained their body weight during oral treatments of A. meyeri, A. odontolyticus , and N. elongata . The mice did not show any changes in their serum corticosterone levels, indicating no handling or environmental stress. (b) Y-maze activity showed no change in the spontaneous alternation in any of the microbiome groups as compared to the vehicle control. (c) Different parameters were tested in the Barnes maze on the recall day after extensive five-day training. No significant change was observed in any parameter in any of the microbiome groups. (d) The forced swim test showed a trending increase in immobility time in the A. meyeri treatment, but it was not significant. Data are represented as mean±SEM (n=6 in each group), **p < 0.01, ***p <0.001; One-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Cannabis-enriched oral Actinomyces induces anxiety-like behavior via impairing mitochondria and GABA signaling

doi: 10.1101/2025.11.21.689724

Figure Lengend Snippet: (a) Baseline levels before starting the battery of behavioral tests. Home cage locomotor activity was increased in all microbiome treatments as compared to the control (F (3,20) =10.12, p=0.0003). All mice healthily gained their body weight during oral treatments of A. meyeri, A. odontolyticus , and N. elongata . The mice did not show any changes in their serum corticosterone levels, indicating no handling or environmental stress. (b) Y-maze activity showed no change in the spontaneous alternation in any of the microbiome groups as compared to the vehicle control. (c) Different parameters were tested in the Barnes maze on the recall day after extensive five-day training. No significant change was observed in any parameter in any of the microbiome groups. (d) The forced swim test showed a trending increase in immobility time in the A. meyeri treatment, but it was not significant. Data are represented as mean±SEM (n=6 in each group), **p < 0.01, ***p <0.001; One-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test.

Article Snippet: Total microbial DNA was extracted from the oral samples using a QIAmp DNA Microbiome kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. qPCR was performed using a CFX96 Real-time system (Bio-Rad).

Techniques: Battery, Activity Assay, Control, Comparison

(a) The single cells obtained from each integrated sample, and their UMAP plots, labeled with the cell types, showing that more excitatory neurons were detected and colored by condition. (b) The UMAP plots show the integrated dataset split by individual treatment as compared to the other microbiome groups. Twenty-two distinct cell types were identified through single-cell RNA sequencing, shown in different colors. (c) Gene ontology analysis of KEGG pathways representing the up-(pink) and down-regulated (blue) pathways, gene count (circle size), and their log10 p values in each dataset from different comparisons. (d) Gene ontology analysis based on Reactome/biological processes representing up- and down-regulated processes, -log(10) p-values (color coded), gene count (circle size), and their enrichment scores [-log10(geometric mean of p-values] through the DAVID bioinformatics functional annotation tool. (f) Heatmaps representing the up- and downregulated differentially expressed genes (according to the average log2 fold-change) in different cell types in each integrated dataset.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Cannabis-enriched oral Actinomyces induces anxiety-like behavior via impairing mitochondria and GABA signaling

doi: 10.1101/2025.11.21.689724

Figure Lengend Snippet: (a) The single cells obtained from each integrated sample, and their UMAP plots, labeled with the cell types, showing that more excitatory neurons were detected and colored by condition. (b) The UMAP plots show the integrated dataset split by individual treatment as compared to the other microbiome groups. Twenty-two distinct cell types were identified through single-cell RNA sequencing, shown in different colors. (c) Gene ontology analysis of KEGG pathways representing the up-(pink) and down-regulated (blue) pathways, gene count (circle size), and their log10 p values in each dataset from different comparisons. (d) Gene ontology analysis based on Reactome/biological processes representing up- and down-regulated processes, -log(10) p-values (color coded), gene count (circle size), and their enrichment scores [-log10(geometric mean of p-values] through the DAVID bioinformatics functional annotation tool. (f) Heatmaps representing the up- and downregulated differentially expressed genes (according to the average log2 fold-change) in different cell types in each integrated dataset.

Article Snippet: Total microbial DNA was extracted from the oral samples using a QIAmp DNA Microbiome kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. qPCR was performed using a CFX96 Real-time system (Bio-Rad).

Techniques: Labeling, RNA Sequencing, Functional Assay

(A) Schematic illustrating the downregulation of genes associated with GABAergic neurotransmission. Reduced GABA synthesis was indicated by GAD1/GAD2 downregulation; impaired reuptake and recycling by reduced SLC6A1 (GAT1); diminished presynaptic release by CACNA1A downregulation; and weakened postsynaptic signaling by decreased expression of GABRA2, PRKCG, and PRKCA. (B) Quantification of GABA levels in mouse brain homogenates, after normalizing with the total protein content in each sample, revealed significant reductions in A. meyeri –treated mice compared with other microbiome groups. (C) UMAP plots (between-group comparison with A. meyeri group as reference) identified three downregulated genes in GABAergic neurons (Lamp5) and astrocytes: GAD1 (glutamate decarboxylase 67), GAD2 (glutamate decarboxylase 65), and SLC6A1 (GAT1). (D–E) Western blot validation demonstrated decreased GAD1 and GAD2 protein levels, with a trend toward reduced GAT1 expression in both Actinomyces groups relative to vehicle controls. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 3–6 per group). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, *** p < 0.00001; one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test .

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Cannabis-enriched oral Actinomyces induces anxiety-like behavior via impairing mitochondria and GABA signaling

doi: 10.1101/2025.11.21.689724

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Schematic illustrating the downregulation of genes associated with GABAergic neurotransmission. Reduced GABA synthesis was indicated by GAD1/GAD2 downregulation; impaired reuptake and recycling by reduced SLC6A1 (GAT1); diminished presynaptic release by CACNA1A downregulation; and weakened postsynaptic signaling by decreased expression of GABRA2, PRKCG, and PRKCA. (B) Quantification of GABA levels in mouse brain homogenates, after normalizing with the total protein content in each sample, revealed significant reductions in A. meyeri –treated mice compared with other microbiome groups. (C) UMAP plots (between-group comparison with A. meyeri group as reference) identified three downregulated genes in GABAergic neurons (Lamp5) and astrocytes: GAD1 (glutamate decarboxylase 67), GAD2 (glutamate decarboxylase 65), and SLC6A1 (GAT1). (D–E) Western blot validation demonstrated decreased GAD1 and GAD2 protein levels, with a trend toward reduced GAT1 expression in both Actinomyces groups relative to vehicle controls. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 3–6 per group). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, *** p < 0.00001; one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test .

Article Snippet: Total microbial DNA was extracted from the oral samples using a QIAmp DNA Microbiome kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. qPCR was performed using a CFX96 Real-time system (Bio-Rad).

Techniques: Expressing, Comparison, Western Blot, Biomarker Discovery

Differences in oral microbiota between Group 1 and Group 2 (1—Group 1; 0—Group 2).

Journal: Journal of Clinical Medicine

Article Title: Does Postoperative Oral and Intestinal Microbiota Correlate with the Weight-Loss Following Bariatric Surgery?—A Cohort Study

doi: 10.3390/jcm9123863

Figure Lengend Snippet: Differences in oral microbiota between Group 1 and Group 2 (1—Group 1; 0—Group 2).

Article Snippet: To increase the accuracy and decrease the risk of bias, three negative controls and two positive controls and ATCC standards for oral microbiome (ATCC ® MSA-1004TM) and gut microbiome (ATCC ® MSA-1006TM, Manassas, Virginia, United States) were included [ ].

Techniques:

Differences in oral microbiota between Group 1 and Group 2 (1—Group 1; 0—Group 2).

Journal: Journal of Clinical Medicine

Article Title: Does Postoperative Oral and Intestinal Microbiota Correlate with the Weight-Loss Following Bariatric Surgery?—A Cohort Study

doi: 10.3390/jcm9123863

Figure Lengend Snippet: Differences in oral microbiota between Group 1 and Group 2 (1—Group 1; 0—Group 2).

Article Snippet: To increase the accuracy and decrease the risk of bias, three negative controls and two positive controls and ATCC standards for oral microbiome (ATCC ® MSA-1004TM) and gut microbiome (ATCC ® MSA-1006TM, Manassas, Virginia, United States) were included [ ].

Techniques: